Artificial Intelligence Literacy and Learning Readiness among University Students

Authors

  • Rita Gupta Head Department of Education GDRCST, Rungta International Skill University Bhilai, Chhattisgarh Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63345/

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence Literacy, Learning Readiness, University Students, Generative AI, Machine Learning, Digital Learning

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in university learning environments, yet students differ substantially in their capacity to understand, evaluate, and responsibly employ AI-supported systems. This study investigates the relationship between AI literacy and learning readiness among university students, conceptualizing AI literacy as a multidimensional capability rather than simple familiarity with generative AI tools. A distinctive research gap is identified in the limited empirical integration of objective AI knowledge, critical evaluation competence, ethical awareness, and human–AI task judgment with students' readiness for autonomous and digitally mediated learning. The study proposes a hybrid analytical framework in which psychometric measures are combined with behavioral AI-literacy tasks and machine-learning prediction of learning-readiness profiles. Particular attention is given to whether students who can critically verify AI-generated information exhibit stronger self-regulation, adaptive learning confidence, and readiness to engage with AI-supported university instruction. The proposed framework further examines whether disciplinary background, prior AI exposure, and frequency of generative-AI use produce systematic differences in the AI literacy–readiness relationship.

References

1. Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

2. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, K. W. S., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). AI literacy: Definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.487

3. Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO.

4. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.

5. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, F., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

6. Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

7. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

8. Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7

9. Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2024). Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers & Education, 214, 105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224

10. Albadarin, Y., Saqr, M., Pope, N., & Tukiainen, M. (2024). A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education. Discover Education, 3, 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00138-2

11. Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, 102411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102411

12. Sperling, K., Stenberg, C., McGrath, C., & others. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy in education: A systematic review of conceptualizations, competencies, and assessment approaches. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence.

13. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., & others. (2023). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review of competencies and educational implications. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence.

14. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

15. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Published

2026-08-17

Similar Articles

1-10 of 65

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.